Not only to try to attract traffic

[hasnasadia]

I liked the new photo editing app, Magic Editor, more than anything else. It's very powerful and, really, seeing how widespread and good Google's mobile photo apps are, like Snapseed , it really has left me wanting more. Hopefully we'll see it soon. But focusing more on what concerns us and what is important: the search. Can this be a risk for SEO? Yes, and a strong one, because AI results push all organic results below the fold (below the initial line of vision when a page loads, because they are below the end of the monitor or screen, and therefore without initial visibility).


On top of that, they are displaced by gcash database text scraped from websites and stealing traffic. And this is where a lot of the catastrophism I have seen on social media comes from, and I think it is exaggerated, due to many factors that we have not taken into account: The same thing is a shot in the foot and comes to nothing, like voice searches, which all the gurus were calling the future of the search engine years ago, and it became a meme, because then no one uses it because it is not practical… But it is also a risk for Google, it may happen that people no longer find it profitable to generate content, which is the basis where the search engine obtains its content, if that is not going to bring them visibility or traffic.


We'll see what happens if, as my friend and colleague Emilio Rodriguez thinks , it's not advisable to block specialized content from AI , since for general queries AI is fine, but if you want specialization and professionalization, you have to visit the websites of clients or projects. It makes perfect sense.to your client or project, but because even Google itself has announced that the search interface with AI will NOT work in the economic or medical sectors, due to the vital importance of a more than possible error of AI, which is based on data that is not always reliable or accurate.