Types of leaders according to Adizes

Optimize crypto dataset operations with database knowledge and collaboration.
Post Reply
Mimakte
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 3:29 am

Types of leaders according to Adizes

Post by Mimakte »

Dr. Ichak Calderon Adizes defined four types of leaders in management (four styles of management). It is difficult to say whether it is more about leadership or management, but in the title of the book the author himself uses the concept of "management styles". This suggests that the Adizes model is intermediate.

Manufacturer (Paei)
Such a manager is characterized by a desire to achieve results, as well as excellent knowledge of his work, its specifics and certain patterns. Achievements and progress towards the goal are important to the manufacturer.

First of all, he gives an answer to the question "What?" and taiwan mobile phone number example in his assessments or answers he is as precise as possible. The word "yes" means "yes" for him, and if he says "no", it means "no". If we assume that the producer does not have the remaining three functions (P -), then he, according to Adizes, is a lone hero who has taken on all the work.

Manufacturer (Paei)

Source: shutterstock.com

Such a manager does not know how to delegate responsibilities and manage, as is typical for the Administrator (pAei). Moreover, his work is usually either short-term or medium-term. He does not think far into the future and does not produce anything new, like the Entrepreneur (paEi). He does not like discussions and the search for a common opinion, he is not a fan of meetings, unlike the Integrator (paeI).


Image



Administrator (pAei)
This type of manager in the organization is engaged in working out details. He makes sure that nothing is missed at the enterprise, checks the work plan for possible errors, controls the process. The administrator is extremely careful. If he said "yes", then it really is "yes", because he has already checked it himself many times.

If the Administrator says "no", then it often means "maybe". This is explained by his caution - it is easier for him to say "no" than "maybe". The main question of such a leader is "How?"

If the Producer is primarily interested in the result, then the Administrator is more interested in the process, or rather its compliance with the law. If the Administrator's other functions are very poorly developed, then he can be called a Bureaucrat.

A bureaucrat knows perfectly well what costs and prices are, but has little understanding of potential values ​​and benefits. He needs a fait accompli. A bureaucrat, by nature, does not like to take risks and strives to minimize all uncertainties. Subordinates of such a leader have to agree with his opinion and follow instructions.

Entrepreneur (paEi)
In his early work, Adizes said that paEi is an Entrepreneur. And later he began to designate pure paEi as a generator of a large number of ideas. He can offer good, not so good and even bad initiatives, but his abilities, unlike the Producer, are not enough to implement them.

Entrepreneur (paEi)

Source: shutterstock.com

Ichak Adizes believed that a good Entrepreneur needs two developed functions - PaEi. Such a person combines the desire to achieve results, the aspiration and the ability to take risks. It is the latter quality that distinguishes a true Entrepreneur from others. The main question of such a leader can be considered "What if?"

An entrepreneur is a person who searches. He first chooses one option and checks it, after which he can continue or stop further actions in this direction. That is, if an entrepreneur said "yes", then most likely it means "maybe", and if he said "no", then it is really "no", because he knows the value of this word and is able to make decisions.

He often makes ill-considered steps based on emotions, so sometimes he contradicts himself. It can be difficult for an entrepreneur to listen to other employees; he wants everyone, like him, to be able to generate ideas that coincide with his own.

Integrator (paeI)
The integrator is primarily concerned with connecting people. He works in an atmosphere of great uncertainty, since personalities cannot be unambiguous.

The question may arise - what is more predictable than people? But this is the other side of the coin, which we will not consider. The main question of the Integrator is "Who?", and also the most important question for him is "How can this be done together?"

It forms connections between people, prevents or resolves conflict situations if they could not be prevented.

The integrator not only sets employees up for work, but creates a favorable atmosphere for interesting collective activities.

He knows that people's motivations can be contradictory and confusing. He is used to many people making promises and then not keeping their word. He also understands that a person can reject something today and agree with it the next day.

All this encourages the Integrator not to be categorical in his assessments and judgments. Therefore, when he says "yes", he means "maybe", and when he says "no", he also means "maybe", because the situation can change.

Integrator (paeI)

Source: shutterstock.com

The integrator's efforts are aimed at forming a professional team that should work well both now and in the future. That is, he works as if in two times - in the present and in the future. This is necessary today, when the Integrator is next to the team, and this will be required in the future, even if he leaves the team for a short time or goes completely, for example, to another organization.

Adizes gave such people the name "Ardent Supporters". In Russian, such a term is not used, perhaps because we do not understand its idiomatic meaning.

That is why the Integrator is also called the Adaptor. He perfectly distinguishes the subtleties of the situation, sensitively senses the mood of colleagues, his superiors or subordinates, which is his significant advantage.

But the Adaptable is unable to defend his position, cannot defend his own strategy. Perhaps he really does not know how to do this, or perhaps he simply does not have his own position. The Adaptable's work is always calculated only for the near future, it is important for him to obtain agreement between all participants directly at the moment.
Post Reply