Measure & Progress Report
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:56 am
Which is better?
This remains a very heated debate with proponents of both sides putting forward their respective arguments. Muay Thai supporters believe that the well-trained Nak Muay KO the BJJ guy to sleep easily. Similarly, BJJ fans rely on choking the Muay Thai fighter into submission once the fight is taken down. So which of the two is more effective when facing off against each other?
In a hypothetical situation where the 2 martial artists meet, the Muay Thai fighter who has no experience in ground combat may be completely helpless once taken to the ground. Therefore, a pure Nak Muay with no grappling training has little hope of escaping the numerous BJJ submissions. On the other hand, a pure BJJ practitioner would likely resort to phone number lookup indonesia ineffective strikes with no training in a stand-up exchange and would be vulnerable to a flurry of Muay Thai low kicks, swipes, punches, and body kicks. For someone who is not conditioned to withstand body strikes, being hit by an experienced Nak Muay will be an excruciating experience.
In a street fight, punches are the most intuitive weapon of choice. A person with experience in Muay Thai will be able to defend and counter effectively, gaining an advantage by being equipped with knowledge of using various body parts to attack. The BJJ practitioner will ideally tackle to take the fight to the ground and most people will not have the knowledge to escape submissions. In reality, street fights have no rules. Biting, weapons, hitting below the belt, and multiple opponents are all possible scenarios. It is difficult to say which will be more effective, although it is safe to say that both are valuable skills against untrained antagonists.
This remains a very heated debate with proponents of both sides putting forward their respective arguments. Muay Thai supporters believe that the well-trained Nak Muay KO the BJJ guy to sleep easily. Similarly, BJJ fans rely on choking the Muay Thai fighter into submission once the fight is taken down. So which of the two is more effective when facing off against each other?
In a hypothetical situation where the 2 martial artists meet, the Muay Thai fighter who has no experience in ground combat may be completely helpless once taken to the ground. Therefore, a pure Nak Muay with no grappling training has little hope of escaping the numerous BJJ submissions. On the other hand, a pure BJJ practitioner would likely resort to phone number lookup indonesia ineffective strikes with no training in a stand-up exchange and would be vulnerable to a flurry of Muay Thai low kicks, swipes, punches, and body kicks. For someone who is not conditioned to withstand body strikes, being hit by an experienced Nak Muay will be an excruciating experience.
In a street fight, punches are the most intuitive weapon of choice. A person with experience in Muay Thai will be able to defend and counter effectively, gaining an advantage by being equipped with knowledge of using various body parts to attack. The BJJ practitioner will ideally tackle to take the fight to the ground and most people will not have the knowledge to escape submissions. In reality, street fights have no rules. Biting, weapons, hitting below the belt, and multiple opponents are all possible scenarios. It is difficult to say which will be more effective, although it is safe to say that both are valuable skills against untrained antagonists.