Interview with the head of the USPA

[roseline371274]

Billion-dollar losses, transit restoration and port digitalization.
In general, most of the answers to problematic issues for the families of deceased law enforcement officers are contained in Government Resolution No. 168 of 28.02.202 "Issues of certain payments to military personnel, privates and commanding officers, police officers and their families during martial law" (paragraph 2).

The next document that needs to be taken into account is the Law of Ukraine “On the National Police” dated July 2, 2015 No. 580-VIII (hereinafter referred to as Law No. 580-VIII). In paragraph 1, part 2, art. 97 states special database that a lump-sum cash benefit in the event of death, disability of a police officer (hereinafter referred to as a lump-sum cash benefit) is a social payment, guaranteed assistance from the state, which is assigned and paid to persons who, under this Law, have the right to receive it, in the event of the death of a police officer as a result of unlawful actions of third parties, or during the performance of actions aimed at saving people's lives or eliminating a threat to their lives, or during participation in an anti-terrorist operation, in the implementation of measures to ensure national security and defense, repel and deter armed aggression of the Russian Federation in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, while being directly in the areas and during the period of implementation of the specified measures, while protecting the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine or the death of a police officer as a result of injury (concussion, trauma or mutilation) received under the specified circumstances; the death of a police officer that occurred while serving in the police force.

It would seem that the legislation and regulations are quite clearly explained, but in practice there are exceptional cases that can determine the general problem.

Yes, we are talking about the indicative decision of the Donetsk District Administrative Court of February 12, 2024 in case No. 200/7094/23.